×

Abstract Submission – ICRAPAIN 2027

Share Your Research at ICRAPAIN 2027

We invite clinicians, researchers, fellows, residents, and students to submit abstracts for presentation at ICRAPAIN. This is an opportunity to showcase original work, interesting clinical observations, innovations in pain practice, and academic contributions in the field of pain medicine.

Authors are encouraged to submit well-structured abstracts that are clear, concise, and scientifically sound.

Who Can Submit

Abstract submissions are welcome from:

  • Pain physicians
  • Anaesthesiologists
  • PM&R specialists
  • Neurologists
  • Orthopaedic specialists
  • Palliative care specialists
  • Fellows and residents
  • Medical students
  • Researchers and allied healthcare professionals working in pain medicine or related disciplines

Categories of Submission

Abstracts may be submitted under one of the following categories:

  1. Original Research
  2. Case Report / Case Series
  3. Review / Educational / Practice Innovation
  4. Quality Improvement / Audit
  5. Interventional Pain Technique / Technical Innovation

Conference Registration Is Mandatory For Submitting an Abstract

Register Now

General Submission Rules

  • The abstract must be submitted in English.
  • The work must be original and should not contain fabricated, plagiarized, or misleading data.
  • The submitting author must ensure that all co-authors have reviewed and approved the abstract before submission.
  • The presenting author must be prepared to present the work if the abstract is accepted.
  • Abstracts must be submitted in the prescribed structured format.
  • The maximum word limit is 300 words, excluding the title, author names, affiliations, and keywords.
  • Tables, graphs, references, and images are not to be included in the abstract body unless specifically requested by the conference.
  • Use standard abbreviations only. When an abbreviation first appears, write it in full followed by the abbreviation in parentheses.
  • Generic drug names should be used wherever possible.
  • Any ethical approval, patient consent, or institutional permission required for the work should have been obtained by the authors before submission.
  • Previously presented work may be considered only if clearly declared at the time of submission.
  • Submission of an abstract does not automatically guarantee acceptance.
  • The scientific committee reserves the right to accept, reject, or reassign the abstract to the most suitable category or presentation format.

Abstract Format

Please prepare the abstract using the following structure.

1. Title

  • Keep the title clear, specific, and concise.
  • Avoid unnecessary abbreviations in the title.
  • Use sentence case or title case consistently.

2. Author Details

Provide:

  • Full name of all authors
  • Institutional affiliation(s)
  • City and country
  • Email address of the corresponding author

3. Abstract Body

The abstract body should be limited to 300 words and should follow the format below depending on the type of submission.

For Original Research

Use these headings:

  • Background
  • Objectives
  • Methods
  • Results
  • Conclusion

For Case Report / Case Series

Use these headings:

  • Background
  • Case description
  • Intervention / Management
  • Outcome
  • Conclusion

For Review / Educational / Innovation / Audit Abstracts

Use these headings as applicable:

  • Background
  • Aim
  • Methods / Description
  • Key findings
  • Conclusion

4. Keywords

  • Provide 3 to 5 keywords.

Formatting Instructions

  • Font: Arial or Times New Roman
  • Font size: 12 pt
  • Line spacing: Single
  • Alignment: Left aligned
  • Avoid bullet points inside the abstract body unless absolutely necessary.
  • Do not include references in the abstract unless specifically requested.
  • Please check spelling, grammar, and consistency before submission.

Ethical and Scientific Responsibility

By submitting an abstract, the authors confirm that:

  • The work is their own original contribution.
  • All listed authors have made an appropriate academic contribution.
  • The data presented are accurate to the best of their knowledge.
  • Required ethical approvals and informed consent have been obtained where applicable.
  • The work does not violate copyright or academic integrity standards.

Any breach of ethical standards may lead to rejection or withdrawal of the abstract.

Review and Selection Process

All submitted abstracts will undergo review by the scientific committee. Abstracts will be evaluated on the basis of:

  • Relevance to pain medicine
  • Originality
  • Scientific or educational value
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Practical significance

Accepted abstracts may be selected for:

  • Oral presentation
  • Poster presentation
  • E-poster presentation

The final mode of presentation will be decided by the scientific committee.

Presentation Rules for Accepted Abstracts

  • At least one author should register for the conference if the abstract is accepted.
  • The presenting author should ensure that the final presentation is accurate, ethical, and consistent with the submitted abstract.
  • Minor editorial corrections may be permitted, but major changes in data or conclusions after acceptance are discouraged.
  • Detailed presentation instructions will be shared with accepted authors separately.

Sample Structured Abstract Format

Title: Ultrasound-guided intervention in chronic pelvic pain: a prospective observational study

Authors: First Author, Second Author, Third Author
Affiliation: Department / Institute, City, Country
Corresponding author email: example@email.com

Background: Chronic pelvic pain remains a challenging condition with significant functional impact.
Objectives: To evaluate the clinical usefulness of ultrasound-guided intervention in selected patients with chronic pelvic pain.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing intervention at a tertiary pain centre. Pain scores and functional outcomes were assessed before and after treatment.
Results: Most patients demonstrated meaningful pain reduction and improvement in daily function at follow-up.
Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided intervention appears to be a feasible and promising option in selected patients with chronic pelvic pain.

Keywords: chronic pelvic pain, ultrasound guidance, intervention, pain medicine

Before You Submit

Please make sure that:

  • The abstract is within the 300-word limit.
  • The abstract follows the required headings.
  • Author details are complete and accurate.
  • The abstract has been reviewed by all co-authors.
  • Ethical requirements have been addressed when required.
  • Contact details of the corresponding author are correct.

Submit Your Abstract

Please complete the online abstract submission form and upload or paste your abstract in the required format.

    I agree with the terms and conditions

    For queries related to abstract submission, please contact the conference secretariat through the official contact details provided on the website.

    Copyright ©2026 all rights reserved
    Developed By: Daradia Pain Foundation